1964 Abarth OT vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 907 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | OT | Camaro |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1697 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 72 L |