1964 Abarth OT vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | OT | Ram |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 88.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 98 L |