1964 Abarth OT vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan X-Trail.
Because 2010 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | OT | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 148 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 65 L |