1964 Abarth OT vs. 2012 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2012 Fiat Bravo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2012 Fiat Bravo. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2012 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 645 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2012 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Abarth | Fiat |
Model | OT | Bravo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 16.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 57 L |