1964 Abarth OT vs. 2012 Renault Megane
To start off, 2012 Renault Megane is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2012 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Abarth | Renault |
| Model | OT | Megane |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 236 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |
