1964 Abarth OT vs. 2012 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Rexton (183 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 1225 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2012 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Abarth | SsangYong |
Model | OT | Rexton |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 17.5:1 |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 176 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 2015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 78 L |