1964 Abarth OT vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1131 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Because 2012 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth OT has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth OT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Abarth | Volvo |
| Model | OT | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1921 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2748 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |
