1964 Abarth OT vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (420 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | OT | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 420 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.7 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4836 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1918 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1377 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2852 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 72 L |
