1964 Abarth OT vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lotus Evora weights approximately 596 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Abarth | Lotus |
| Model | OT | Evora |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 83 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2575 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |
