1964 AC Aceca vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1967 DAF Daffodil is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,969 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 AC Aceca weights approximately 234 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 AC Aceca | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | AC | DAF |
| Model | Aceca | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1969 cc | 745 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 33 L |
