1964 AC Aceca vs. 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri
To start off, 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri weights approximately 606 kg more than 1964 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 AC Aceca | 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Aceca | Karmann Asso di Quadri |
Year Released | 1964 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2660 mm |