1964 AC Aceca vs. 1982 BMW 328
To start off, 1982 BMW 328 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 BMW 328 weights approximately 612 kg more than 1964 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 BMW 328 (210 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 1982 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 AC Aceca | 1982 BMW 328 | |
| Make | AC | BMW |
| Model | Aceca | 328 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1969 cc | 2793 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1506 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2840 mm |
