1964 AC Aceca vs. 1992 Audi 100
To start off, 1992 Audi 100 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 100 (172 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1964 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1964 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 100 weights approximately 656 kg more than 1964 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 AC Aceca | 1992 Audi 100 | |
| Make | AC | Audi |
| Model | Aceca | 100 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1969 cc | 2771 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 172 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2690 mm |
