1964 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSS

To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSS is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi SSS (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1964 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSS should accelerate faster than 1964 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSS weights approximately 1011 kg more than 1964 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSS (270 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 AC Aceca.

Compare all specifications: