1964 AC Aceca vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2002 Suzuki F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 576 kg more than 1964 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 AC Aceca (167 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1964 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 AC Aceca | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | AC | Suzuki |
| Model | Aceca | F1 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1969 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 45 L |
