1964 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,768 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1964 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1964 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 679 kg more than 1964 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1964 AC Aceca | 2005 Chevrolet Colorado | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Aceca | Colorado |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 2768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1573 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 72 L |