1964 AC Aceca vs. 2007 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2007 Chrysler 300 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler 300 (246 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1964 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1964 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler 300 (341 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2007 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1964 AC Aceca | 2007 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | AC | Chrysler |
Model | Aceca | 300 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 3518 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 246 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 341 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 81 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 68 L |