1964 AC Aceca vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1964 AC Aceca. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1964 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1964 AC Aceca | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | AC | Jaguar |
Model | Aceca | XF |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |