1964 AC Aceca vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,998 cc (24 cylinders), 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander (227 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1964 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1964 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 806 kg more than 1964 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander (292 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1964 AC Aceca | 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Aceca | Outlander |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 24 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4665 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2670 mm |