1964 AC Cobra vs. 1978 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 1978 Toyota Tercel is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,737 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 AC Cobra weights approximately 190 kg more than 1978 Toyota Tercel.
Because 1964 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Toyota Tercel has automatic transmission and 1964 AC Cobra has manual transmission. 1964 AC Cobra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Toyota Tercel will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 AC Cobra | 1978 Toyota Tercel | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | Cobra | Tercel |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4737 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2510 mm |
