1964 AC Cobra vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 1980 Mazda 323 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,737 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 AC Cobra weights approximately 135 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 AC Cobra | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Cobra | 323 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4737 cc | 1415 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2320 mm |