1964 AC Cobra vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1980 Volvo 66 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,737 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 AC Cobra (267 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 AC Cobra weights approximately 188 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 1964 AC Cobra has manual transmission. 1964 AC Cobra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 AC Cobra | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | AC | Volvo |
Model | Cobra | 66 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4737 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1390 mm |