1964 AC Cobra vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,737 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 AC Cobra (267 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 500 kg more than 1964 AC Cobra.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 AC Cobra (426 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (213 Nm). This means 1964 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
1964 AC Cobra | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cobra | Outlander |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4737 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 426 Nm | 213 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.7 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 59 L |