1964 AC Cobra vs. 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,269 HP @ 6075 RPM) has 1002 more horse power than 1964 AC Cobra. (267 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero should accelerate faster than 1964 AC Cobra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero weights approximately 240 kg more than 1964 AC Cobra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 AC Cobra | 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
| Make | AC | SSC |
| Model | Cobra | Ultimate Aero |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4737 cc | 6350 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 1269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6075 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1090 mm |
