1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1953 Allard J2
To start off, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1953 Allard J2. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 1953 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1953 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1953 Allard J2 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Allard |
| Model | 2600 | J2 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 5416 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 38 L |
