1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 755 kg more than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 2600 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 79 L |
