1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1969 Alpine A
To start off, 1969 Alpine A is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 (145 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 547 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1969 Alpine A | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Alpine |
| Model | 2600 | A |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 1565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1277 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2110 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 50 L |
