1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1983 Austin Maestro

To start off, 1983 Austin Maestro is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (86 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 386 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 1983 Austin Maestro
Make Alfa Romeo Austin
Model 2600 Maestro
Year Released 1964 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2584 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 163 HP 86 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 123 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.8:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1370 kg 984 kg
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 4060 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2510 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]