1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1988 Renault Megane
To start off, 1988 Renault Megane is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Renault Megane (250 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Because 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 (216 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Renault Megane. (181 Nm). This means 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1988 Renault Megane | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Renault |
Model | 2600 | Megane |
Year Released | 1964 | 1988 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 216 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |