1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1995 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 1995 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Daewoo Arcadia (203 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. (145 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 313 kg more than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1995 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Daewoo |
| Model | 2600 | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 3206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 203 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1277 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4960 mm |
