1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1998 Toyota Caldina

To start off, 1998 Toyota Caldina is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 (145 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1998 Toyota Caldina. (114 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 1998 Toyota Caldina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 77 kg more than 1998 Toyota Caldina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Caldina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Toyota Caldina. (155 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Toyota Caldina.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 1998 Toyota Caldina
Make Alfa Romeo Toyota
Model 2600 Caldina
Year Released 1964 1998
Body Type Convertible Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2584 cc 1762 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 145 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 216 Nm 155 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 81.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 85.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1277 kg 1200 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2590 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 100 L 60 L