1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1999 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 1999 Dodge Dakota is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1999 Dodge Dakota.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge Dakota (468 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. (220 Nm). This means 1999 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1999 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
Model | 2600 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 5898 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 468 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3330 mm |