1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1999 Dodge Durango
To start off, 1999 Dodge Durango is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Durango (360 HP) has 215 more horse power than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1999 Dodge Durango.
Because 1999 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge Durango (559 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. (216 Nm). This means 1999 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1999 Dodge Durango | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
| Model | 2600 | Durango |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 559 Nm |
| Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 228 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1277 kg | 1057 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2950 mm |
