1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1999 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 1999 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Saab 05-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Saab 05-Sep (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. (145 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Saab 05-Sep should accelerate faster than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Because 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Saab 05-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Saab 05-Sep (311 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. (216 Nm). This means 1999 Saab 05-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1999 Saab 05-Sep | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Saab |
| Model | 2600 | 05-Sep |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 2958 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 311 Nm |
| Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2710 mm |
