1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 315 more horse power than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. (145 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 (216 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 2600 | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2580 mm |