1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 (145 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 628 kg more than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. (216 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 2600 | SSU |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1277 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 71 L |
