1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 3,969 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (301 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. (216 Nm). This means 2001 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
| Model | 2600 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 3969 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 301 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2380 mm |
