1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (331 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1749 kg more than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. (220 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
Model | 2600 | Ram |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 5621 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 331 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 509 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 2864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 132 L |