1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 (145 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 253 kg more than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Kia |
| Model | 2600 | K2700 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 2665 cc |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4150 RPM |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 94.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 95 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1277 kg | 1530 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 60 L |
