1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 263 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 2600 | Rustler |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 1586 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 216 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1277 kg | 1014 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 54 L |