1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 (163 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2009 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Because 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 (220 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 2600 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 153 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2685 mm |