1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 118 more horse power than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600. (220 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 2600 | UTE |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |