1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 1982 Renault Siete
To start off, 1982 Renault Siete is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,570 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia (105 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1982 Renault Siete. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault Siete. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia weights approximately 155 kg more than 1982 Renault Siete. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia (133 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault Siete. (84 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault Siete.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 1982 Renault Siete | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Renault |
Model | Giulia | Siete |
Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 44 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2540 mm |