1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 1992 Italdesign Columbus
To start off, 1992 Italdesign Columbus is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Italdesign Columbus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Italdesign Columbus (295 HP) has 190 more horse power than 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Italdesign Columbus should accelerate faster than 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Because 1992 Italdesign Columbus is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Italdesign Columbus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Italdesign Columbus (450 Nm) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm). This means 1992 Italdesign Columbus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 1992 Italdesign Columbus | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Italdesign |
| Model | Giulia | Columbus |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1570 cc | 4988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 295 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 84.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 6000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 2200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3830 mm |
