1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia (105 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 375 kg more than 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Because 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Giulia | CU-X |
Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 80 L |