1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2006 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,899 cc, 2006 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2006 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | Giulia | BLS |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1899 cc |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
