1964 Alfa Romeo Spider vs. 2002 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2002 Mercury Sable is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alfa Romeo Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alfa Romeo Spider would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Alfa Romeo Spider (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2002 Mercury Sable. (153 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Alfa Romeo Spider should accelerate faster than 2002 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercury Sable weights approximately 180 kg more than 1964 Alfa Romeo Spider.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercury Sable (251 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Alfa Romeo Spider. (221 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Alfa Romeo Spider.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alfa Romeo Spider | 2002 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercury |
Model | Spider | Sable |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2582 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 85 L |