1964 Alpine A 110 vs. 1996 Lada 110
To start off, 1996 Lada 110 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lada 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lada 110 (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lada 110 should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A 110.
Because 1964 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A 110 | 1996 Lada 110 | |
Make | Alpine | Lada |
Model | A 110 | 110 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 71 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2500 mm |