1964 Alpine A 110 vs. 1999 BMW V12
To start off, 1999 BMW V12 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 5,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW V12 (550 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 501 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW V12 weights approximately 1055 kg more than 1964 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 BMW V12 has automatic transmission and 1964 Alpine A 110 has manual transmission. 1964 Alpine A 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 BMW V12 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alpine A 110 | 1999 BMW V12 | |
| Make | Alpine | BMW |
| Model | A 110 | V12 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 5990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 550 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2890 mm |
