1964 Alpine A 110 vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1750 kg more than 1964 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A 110 | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A 110 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3510 mm |